The Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) allows a person to make an advance care directive that can
It is no longer possible for a person to appoint a guardian under the Guardianship and Administration Act 1993 (SA). However, any power of guardianship executed and guardian appointed before 1 July 2014 will be taken to be an advance care directive and substitute decision-maker under the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA).
It is no longer possible to complete an anticipatory direction or make a medical power of attorney appointing a medical agent under the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (SA). However, any directive or medical power of attorney given and agent appointed before 1 July 2014 will be taken to be an advance care directive and substitute decision-maker under the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA).
See Advance care directives before July 2014.
All references in this section are to the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) unless stated otherwise.
Section 11 of the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) provides the ability to make an advance care directive. An advance care directive covers personal matters: future health care, residential and accommodation matters and personal affairs [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 11(3)]. An advance care directive is different from an enduring power of attorney, which covers the management of a person's financial affairs only.
A person cannot make an advance care directive on behalf of another person, even if they are the guardian or parent of that person [s 11(4)].
Both types of advance directives (enduring powers of attorney and advance care directives) are arrangements which allow a person to plan ahead, thereby providing a possible alternative to the involvement of the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal at a later stage in a person's life should they become legally incapacitated.
Another key difference between an enduring power of attorney and an advance care directive relates to the need to appoint a substitute decision-maker. An enduring power of attorney document must appoint someone to make decisions for the donor of the power. However, there is no need to appoint a substitute decision-maker when making an advance care directive. The directive may simply be used to set out a person’s wishes in relation to future health care, residential and accommodation matters and their personal affairs.
Recognition of interstate advance care directives
Documents equivalent to the South Australian advance care directive that have been made under interstate law are recognised in South Australia and treated as if they were advance care directives made under the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) [s 33(2)(a); Advance Care Directives Regulations 2014 (SA) reg 12].
However, an interstate advance care directive can only be revoked in the manner allowed for under the relevant interstate law. Apart from revocation, the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) applies to an interstate advance care directive [s 33(2)(b)]. Thus, even if certain provisions are acceptable under interstate law, if they are not allowed to be included under South Australian law, they are not valid. See What can be included in an advance care directive.
The Advance Care Directives Act 2013 sets out the following objects [s 9]:
Section 10 of the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) sets out the following principles that must be taken into account in relation to the administration, operation and enforcement of the Act and the resolution of disputes under the Act:
Competence
A competent adult may make an advance care directive [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 11].
An adult who wants to make an advance care directive needs to complete a specific form while they have legal capacity, that is, while they are competent. To be competent to make an advance care directive, a person must understand what an advance care directive is and the consequences of giving an advance care directive [s 11(1)].
Sometimes it is difficult to assess whether or not someone is competent. Someone who is not competent would be unable to understand the nature of the document and its effect, or be unable to communicate in any way.
Being physically incapacitated, for example being paralysed and unable to sign documents, does not necessarily mean that a person is not competent. The person may still be able to understand the document and its implications. If the person is able to communicate this in some way, then they can be considered competent.
This can be a complex area of law. If there is a question about a person's competence it is best to obtain a written medical opinion, preferably from the person's own doctor.
It is an offence to induce another to make an advance care directive using dishonesty or undue influence [s 56(1)]. The maximum penalty is imprisonment for 10 years.
Forms
An advance care directive must be made using a specific form [s 11(2)(a)].
SA Health released a new advance care directive form on 1 March 2024. Advance care directives made using the previous form remain legally valid. Part-completed advance care directives on the previous form may be completed or may be started afresh on the new form.
SA Health has also prepared a new advance care directive kit which includes instructions on how to complete an advance care directive. The kit includes the Advance Care Directive Information Statement that witnesses are required to give to the person completing the directive.
An advance care directive form can be filled in and created online at the Advance Care Directives website. Alternatively, the blank form and the kit can both be downloaded and printed free of charge from the website.
A professionally printed hard copy of the advance care directives kit can be obtained for free from Service SA in person or by post (postage fees apply), or at selected local public libraries. Visit the Advance Care Directives website for more information.
When a person has completed an advance care directive form, they must sign it in the presence of a suitable witness [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 15(1)(a); Advance Care Directives Regulations 2014 (SA) reg 7(1)].
When a substitute decision-maker is being appointed
If the person is appointing 1 or more substitute decision-makers under their advance care directive, then the advance care directive must not be witnessed until each substitute decision-maker appointed has completed and signed the relevant part of the form [regs 7(1)(a), 8(1)]. The signatures of the substitute decision-makers do not need to be witnessed.
Suitable witnesses
A suitable witness must be:
The Advance Care Directives Regulations 2014 now prescribe health practitioners, Justices of the Peace, legal practitioners, social workers, police officers and teachers as suitable witnesses. The Advance Care Directives (Miscellaneous) Amendment Regulations 2024 (SA) removed a number of classes of persons from this list, with effect from 1 March 2024. An advance care directive made before that date and witnessed by someone no longer on the list of suitable witnesses is nevertheless valid (assuming it otherwise complies with the Act and Regulations).
Witness obligations
Before the person making the advance care directive signs the form, the witness must give the person an advance care directive information statement [s 15(1)(b)(i); reg 7(2)]. This statement is available online and in the DIY Kit accessible via the Advance Care Directives Website.
The witness must also explain to the person the legal effects of giving an advance care directive [s 15(1)(b)(ii)]. While simply giving the person an advance care directive information statement is taken to be an explanation of the legal effects of the document [reg 7(2)], the witness must be satisfied that the person understands the information and explanation [s 15(1)(b)(iii)]. A witness should have a conversation with the person about the proposed advance care directive to ensure that the person understands the nature and effects of the document.
If a witness has any doubt about the person’s ability to understand the nature and effects of the advance care directive, they should not sign the form. The witness may suggest that the person obtains legal advice to have the advance care directive further explained. Alternatively, if it is a question of the person’s ability to understand the document, the witness may request the person obtains a medical certificate indicating they are competent to make the advance care directive.
The witness must also be of the opinion that the person does not appear to be acting under any form of duress or coercion [s 15(1)(b)(iv)]. Again, the witness should have a conversation with the person to be sure. A person may act under duress or coercion that exists solely due to a perception or mistake on their own part [s 15(3)]. If the witness has any doubts, they should not sign the form.
Making an advance care directive revokes any previous advance care directive [s 17]. A witness should ask the person whether they have previously made an advance care directive and be satisfied that the person understands the consequences of revoking the existing advance care directive [s 29(1)]. See: Changing or revoking an advance care directive.
Conflict of interest
A person cannot witness an advance care directive if they [s 15(2)]:
When a person's first language is not English
An advance care directive form must be completed in English [s 14(1)(c)]. However, a person for whom English is not their first language may give an advance care directive with the assistance of an interpreter in accordance with s 14 of the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 [s 14(1)(a)].
If an interpreter is used, the interpreter must
A person who is a suitable witness in relation to a particular advance care directive may act as an interpreter for the person giving the directive [s 14].
From 1 March 2024, amendments to s 14 of the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) will clarify that interpreters must not:
While an advance care directive comes into force as soon as it is witnessed [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 16(1)], it may only be used by a substitute decision-maker or health practitioner if the person who gave the advance care directive has impaired decision-making capacity [s 34]. The impaired capacity must relate to the particular decision that has to be made at the time [s 34].
Impaired decision-making capacity
A person is considered to have impaired decision-making capacity in respect of a particular decision if any of the following apply [s 7]:
An advance care directive may set out when the person who made it is to be considered to have impaired decision-making capacity in relation to particular decisions [s 7(1)(b)].
Pursuant to s 10, a person is presumed to have full decision-making capacity, must be allowed to make their own decisions to the extent that they are able, and may make decisions in collaboration with others.
Decision-making capacity is not always static. A person may fluctuate between having impaired decision-making capacity and full decision-making capacity [s 7(2)(c)]. Further, a person's decision-making capacity will not be taken to be impaired merely because their decision results, or may result, in an adverse outcome for the person [s 7(2)(d)].
Making a new advance care directive
It is not possible for a person to change an advance care directive [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 18]. If a person wishes to change, remove or add something in their advance care directive, they must make a completely new advance care directive and go through the witnessing process again.
When a person makes a new advance care directive, any previous advance care directive is automatically revoked when the new one is signed and witnessed [ss 16(1), 17(1)]. In assessing the person’s competence to make the new directive, the witness should also form an opinion that the person understands the consequences of revoking the earlier directive [s 29(1)].
Giving written notice
An advance care directive may also be revoked by the person giving, or causing to be given, a written indication that they have revoked the advance care directive [Advance Care Directives Regulations 2014 reg 10(b)].
In order for the revocation to be effective, the person must have been competent at the time of giving the notice and have understood the consequences of the revocation [s 29(1)].
If there is any doubt as to the person’s competence or understanding of the consequences of making a revocation, then SACAT must be advised of the situation. See: When the person is not competent.
Consequences of revocation
If a person who is competent revokes an advance care directive, by either making a new directive or giving written notice, they must, as soon as practicable [s 29(3)]:
It is an offence for a person to act as a substitute decision-maker knowing that the advance care directive has been revoked, with a maximum penalty of imprisonment for 10 years [s 56(2)(a)].
In certain circumstances, SACAT can revoke an advance care directive on behalf of a person who is not competent. The issue of whether to revoke an advance care directive may come before the Tribunal in one of two ways:
Notification of a person's wish to revoke
If someone becomes aware that a person who is no longer competent to revoke an advance care directive wishes or appears to wish to revoke their advance care directive, then they must advise SACAT as soon as practicable in accordance with SACAT's rules and directions [s 31(1), Advance Care Directives Regulations 2014 reg 11].
Upon receiving notification of an alleged wish to revoke, SACAT may give any directions that the Tribunal thinks necessary or desirable in the circumstances of the case [s 31(2)]. It is an offence to fail to comply with such a direction of SACAT, with a maximum penalty of $20,000 or imprisonment for 6 months [s 31(3)].
A decision by SACAT following notification of a person's wish to revoke an advance care directive is a decision made under its original jurisdiction [s 31(6)], which means that the decision is subject to its internal review process, see State administrative appeals.
Formal application to revoke
A formal application to revoke must be made in the manner and form set out by SACAT [s 32(2)(a)(i)].
When SACAT will revoke an advance care directive
If SACAT receives a notification of a person's wish to revoke an advance care directive or a formal application to revoke an advance care directive, SACAT must revoke the advance care directive if satisfied that [s 32(2)(b)]:
An advance care directive may state that it is not to be revoked under s 31 or s 32. If so, the Tribunal 'should not revoke the advance care directive unless satisfied that the current wishes of the person who gave the advance care directive indicate a conscious wish to override such a provision' [s 32(3)].
If the Tribunal revokes an advance care directive, it [s 32(4)]:
In the case of an urgent request for revocation of an advance care directive, the Tribunal may make a decision without giving notice of the proceedings. However, the decision may only have effect for up to 21 days [s 54(2)]. See SACAT - notice of proceedings.
Directions, wishes and values
A competent adult may use an advance care directive to give directions about their future health care, residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 9(a)].
A competent adult may also use an advance care directive to express their wishes and values about health care, residential and accommodation arrangements and personal affairs, including by specifying outcomes or interventions that they wish to avoid [s 9(b)].
Expressions of wishes regarding organ and tissue donation can also be included in an advance care directive, which can be relied on as evidence of the person's wishes when required.
A person cannot make a valid request for voluntary assisted dying in an advance care directive pursuant to the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2021 (SA) [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) ss 7A and 12(1a)]. In order to be eligible for voluntary assisted dying, a person must have decision-making capacity throughout the pathway which means that an advance care directive would not apply [see Voluntary Assisted Dying Pathway].
See also: Giving effect to an advance care directive.
Binding provisions
A provision of an advance care directive comprising a refusal of particular health care (whether express or implied) is a binding provision [s 19(1)].
If a binding provision of an advance care directive is expressed to apply, or to be binding, only in specified circumstances, the provision will be taken to be a binding provision only in respect of those circumstances [s 19(2)].
All other provisions of an advance care directive are non-binding provisions [s 19(3)].
If it is intended that medication will be taken pursuant to a permit issued under the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2021 (SA), an advance care directive may need to be remade to ensure that medical staff are not required to comply with a directive requiring life saving measures after the medication has been taken.
For information about when a health practitioner may refuse to comply with a binding provision of an advance care directive, see Giving effect to an advance care directive.
A person giving an advance care directive may appoint 1 or more adults to be substitute decision-makers in respect of the advance care directive [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 21(1)]. The appointment of a substitute decision-maker is not required for an advance care directive to be valid.
Unless the advance care directive states otherwise, if 2 or more substitute decision-makers are appointed under an advance care directive, they are each empowered to make decisions separately and together [s 22]. An advance care directive may place conditions on the exercise of substitute decision-making powers or appoint substitute decision-makers as alternative substitute decision-makers and limit their powers to when a specified substitute decision-maker is unavailable.
Who cannot be a substitute decision-maker
The following persons cannot be appointed or act as a substitute decision-maker [s 21(2)]:
Acceptance of appointment
A substitute decision-maker must certify, by completing and signing the relevant part of the advance care directive form, that they accept the appointment as a substitute decision-maker, and have read and understand the guidelines for substitute decision-makers (available at the Advance Care Directives website) [s 21(3), Advance Care Directives Regulations 2014 (SA) reg 8].
All substitute decision-makers must accept their appointment before the advance care directive is signed by the person appointing them and witnessed by a suitable witness [reg 8(1)].
The Office for Ageing Well and the Office of the Public Advocate together have put together a Substitute Decision-Maker Toolkit including a guide, factsheet, conversation starters and video resources.
Powers of a substitute decision-maker
A substitute decision-maker appointed under an advance care directive may make any decision that the person who gave the advance care directive could have lawfully made in relation to [s 23]:
The advance care directive may limit the matters a substitute decision-maker can make decisions about.
An advance care directive cannot be used to allow a substitute decision-maker to perform functions that the person who gave the advance care directive has as a trustee or personal representative of another [s 23(3)].
An advance care directive does not authorise a substitute decision-maker to refuse the administration of drugs to relieve pain or distress, or the natural provision of food and liquids by mouth [s 23(4)].
Although a substitute decision-maker has a responsibility to protect a person's interests, they do not have the obligation to care for the daily needs of that person. The decisions of a substitute decision-maker extend to all personal decisions (unless limited by the advance care directive); however, the substitute decision-maker has no authority to interfere with civil liberties, for example, intercepting mail or preventing a person from marrying.
Renouncing an appointment
A substitute decision-maker may renounce their appointment by giving written notice to the person who appointed them [s 27(1)].
The permission of SACAT is needed if a substitute decision-maker is the only person appointed under an advance care directive, and they wish to renounce their appointment during a period in which the person who gave the advance care directive is not competent [s 27(3)].
Removal of Substitute Decision-Maker by SACAT
Pursuant to s 51, if a substitute decision-maker:
SACAT may, of its own motion or on application by an eligible person:
SACAT should not revoke an advance care directive in these circumstances if there are still provisions in the document that can continue to have effect, in spite of the removal of the substitute decision-maker [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 51(5)].
If an advance care directive contains any of the following provisions, that provision is void and of no effect. Any other provisions of the advance care directive remain effective.
Powers of attorney
An advance care directive cannot give a power of attorney in relation to financial or legal matters [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 13(1)]. This must be done under the Powers of Attorney and Agency Act 1984 (SA).
Stipulation of health care
Although a person may refuse health care of any kind, or require it to be stopped, including health care that would save or prolong their life, a health practitioner cannot be compelled to provide a particular form of health care to a person by an advance care directive [s 6(1)].
Unlawful acts
An advance care directive cannot include a provision that is unlawful, or that would require an unlawful act to be performed [s 12(1)(a)].
Contravention of professional standards
An advance care directive cannot include a provision that would, if given effect, cause a health practitioner or other person to contravene a professional standard or code of conduct applying to the health practitioner or person [s 12(1)(a)].
Refusal of mandatory medical treatment
An advance care directive cannot include a provision that amounts to a refusal of mandatory medical treatment [s 12(1)(b)].
'Mandatory medical treatment' is:
Voluntary assisted dying
A person can indicate a preference for voluntary assisted dying in an advance care directive, however it will not be taken to be a request for the purposes of the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2021 (SA) [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) ss 7A and 12].
Substitute Decision-Makers
Principles of decision-making
When making a decision under an advance care directive, a substitute decision-maker must, as far as is reasonably practicable [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 35(1)(a)]:
The substitute decision-maker must make the decision that they reasonably believe the person who gave the advance care directive would have made in the circumstances [s 35(1)(b)] and must act in good faith and with due diligence [s 35(1)(c)].
A substitute decision-maker should not ignore professional advice or damage any of the person's relationships or friendships. The substitute decision-maker can request services and information from service providers, and has the authority to speak on behalf of the person who appointed them, to ensure that necessary services are provided.
Making decisions when there is more than one substitute decision-maker
If more than 1 substitute decision-maker is appointed under an advance care directive, then the substitute decision-makers may exercise powers and make decisions together or separately [s 22], unless the advance care directive specifically says otherwise.
An advance care directive may, for example, expressly require decisions to be made or powers to be exercised jointly by all substitute decision-makers.
Alternatively, an advance care directive may say, for example, that one substitute decision-maker can make decisions about certain matters, and another substitute decision-maker can make decisions about other matters.
Substitute decision-makers may also be appointed in the alternative such that a substitute decision-maker may only be empowered to act if the first appointed substitute decision-maker is unavailable.
Notification of decisions
If a substitute decision-maker makes a decision under the advance care directive, they must take reasonable steps to notify each other substitute decision-maker appointed under the advance care directive of the decision [s 25].
Health Practitioners
A health practitioner who is providing, or is to provide, health care to a person who has given an advance care directive and who has impaired decision-making capacity in respect of a decision that is required in relation to the health care [s 36(1)]:
Health practitioners are exempt from complying with a binding provision of an advance care directive under s 36(1) in respect of health care where:
This exemption has been clarified by the Advance Care Directives (Review) Amendment Act 2023 (SA), with effect from 1 March 2024. Under s 36 as amended, a health practitioner may provide health care in contravention of a binding provision of an advance care directive to save the person's life following self-harm. The health practitioner is required to document the provision of health care in accordance with the requirements set out in the regulations.
Alternatively, the health practitioner may decide to comply with the person's refusal of health care in their advance care directive, provided this is otherwise consistent with the health practitioner's usual professional standards.
If this topic has caused personal distress, assistance is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Call Lifeline on 13 11 14 or visit their website.
When an advance care directive may not be followed
A health practitioner may refuse to comply with a provision of an advance care directive if the health practitioner believes on reasonable grounds that [s 36(2)]:
A health practitioner may refuse to comply with a provision of an advance care directive that specifies the kind of health care that the person who gave the advance care directive wishes to receive if such health care [s 36(3)]:
However, a health practitioner must still comply with a binding provision even if it is not consistent with any relevant professional standards or does not reflect current standards of health care in the State [s 36(4)].
Similarly, if a provision of an advance care directive relates to the withdrawal or withholding of health care, including the withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining measures, then a health practitioner cannot refuse to comply with the provision on the basis that it is not consistent with any relevant professional standards or does not reflect current standards of health care in the State [s 36(4)].
A health practitioner may refuse to comply with a provision of an advance care directive on conscientious grounds [s 37]. In this case, care of the person should be given to another health practitioner.
Prior to July 2014, it was possible to make three different types of advance care directive: an enduring power of guardianship, a medical power of attorney, and an anticipatory direction. These forms of advance care directive are no longer available. The current advance care directive form enables a person to do anything they could have done using these previous types of directive.
However, any enduring power of guardianship, medical power of attorney, or anticipatory direction made before July 2014 is still valid. There is no need to make an advance care directive to replace a previous form.
Enduring power of guardianship
While it is no longer possible for a person to appoint a guardian under the Guardianship and Administration Act 1993 (SA), any enduring power of guardianship executed and guardian appointed before 1 July 2014 will be taken to be an advance care directive and substitute decision-maker under the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) [sch 1 cl 35(1)].
Incomplete enduring guardianship forms
If an enduring guardianship form had been created prior to July 2014 but the person appointed as the enduring guardian had not signed the acceptance section of the form, or the form had not been witnessed, then the form can still be completed (endorsed or signed or both) [sch 3 cl 1(3) Advance Care Directives Regulations 2014]. Upon endorsement and signing, the enduring guardianship form will be taken to be an advance care directive [sch 3 cls 1(3)(c), (7)]. Any incomplete enduring guardianship forms must be completed by 31 December 2015 [sch 3 cl 1(3(b)(ii)]. After this date, an advance care directve form must be used.
Medical power of attorney
While it is no longer possible to make a medical power of attorney appointing a medical agent under the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (SA), any medical power of attorney executed and agent appointed before 1 July 2014 will be taken to be an advance care directive and substitute decision-maker under the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) [sch 1 cl 33(1)].
Anticipatory directions
Similarly, while it is no longer possible to complete an anticipatory direction under the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (SA), any anticipatory direction made before 1 July 2014 will be taken to be an advance care directive under the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) [sch 1 cl 32(1)].
Natural Death Act forms
Formerly, the Natural Death Act 1983 (SA) enabled a person suffering from a terminal illness to complete a form similar to an anticipatory direction form. In 1995 the Act was revoked, but any declarations made before 1995 were still valid under the Consent to Medical Treatment and Palliative Care Act 1995 (SA). Natural Death Act directions made before 1995 are still valid and taken to be an advance care directive under the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) [sch 1 cl 34(1)].
Multiple forms
If a person has made more than one of an enduring power of guardianship, a medical power of attorney, and an anticipatory direction, they are all valid, but they are treated as one advance care directive under the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) [sch 1 cl 36].
Provisions contrary to the Advance Care Directives Act 2013
As these pre July 2014 forms are taken to be advance care directives, any provision they may contain that is contrary to the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) is of no effect [sch 1 cl 32(2), 33(2), 34(2), 35(2); sch 3 cl 1(6)]. See: What cannot be included.
Revocation of pre-July 2014 forms
As the pre July 2014 forms are taken to be advance care directives, they can be revoked in the same way as an advance care directive. See: Changing or revoking an advance care directive. A competent adult who has made one or more of the former advance care directives may choose to revoke them by making a new advance care directive. If a person has more than one of the former directives, making a new advance care directive will revoke all of them.
Disputes
Any disputes concerning pre July 2014 forms are dealt with as if the forms were advance care directives. See Disputes.
Disputes that may be dealt with by the Office of the Public Advocate or SACAT
Pursuant to s 44 of the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA), the Office of the Public Advocate or SACAT may be able to resolve disputes about:
Those who may go to the Office of the Public Advocate or SACAT for assistance about an advance care directive are [s 43]:
Under the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA), the Office of the Public Advocate may give preliminary assistance to help resolve a dispute about an advance care directive [s 45(1)]. This might include ensuring the people involved are aware of their rights and obligations, identifying issues in dispute, canvassing options, and facilitating communication between the parties.
The Office of the Public Advocate may also mediate disputes [s 45(2)]. Information exchanged during a mediation pursuant to section 45(2) remains confidential and is not subject to an application under the Freedom of Information Act 1991 (SA) [Freedom of Information (Exempt Agency) Regulations 2023 reg 13(c)].
The Office of the Public Advocate may refer a matter it is mediating or a dispute it is assisting with to SACAT on the basis that it would be more appropriate for the matter to be dealt with by SACAT [ss 45(3), 46].
From 1 March 2024, the Office of the Public Advocate will no longer be able to make declarations about matters such as the nature and scope of a person's powers and responsibilities under an advance care directive and whether or not the person who gave the advance care directive has impaired decision-making capacity in relation to a specified decision, as was previously available under s 45(5).
The Office of the Public Advocate may refer any question of law for the opinion of the Supreme Court [s 46A].
See the Office of the Public Advocate'swebsite for more information.
Pursuant to s 48 of the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA), SACAT may:
It is an offence not to comply with a direction of SACAT made under s 48 [s 50].
SACAT may also review a matter dealt with by the Office of the Public Advocate under s 45 [s 48(1)(a)].
If SACAT is of the opinion that it is more appropriate that a particular application be dealt with by the Office of the Public Advocate, SACAT may refer the matter to the Office of the Public Advocate [s 49(1)].
Notice of proceedings
SACAT must give reasonable notice of the time and place of proceedings to the applicant, the person to whom the proceedings relate, the Office of the Public Advocate, and anyone else the Tribunal considers to have a proper interest in the matter [s 54(1)].
If urgent action is required in proceedings, SACAT may make an order or decision without giving notice, but the order or decision may only have effect for up to 21 days [s 54(2)].
Representation before SACAT
The person who is the subject of proceedings before SACAT may represent themselves, or may be represented by counsel [South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (SA) s 56], the Public Advocate, or, unless it is an internal review, a recognised advocate [Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) s 54B].
Reasons for decisions
Written reasons for SACAT decisions must be given to a person who has a right to seek an internal review, if the person requests the reasons. The request for reasons must be made before the time limit for seeking the review, or, if the application for review has already been made, before the review is decided [s 54A].
Written reasons must also be given on request by a person who satisfies SACAT that they have a proper interest in the matter [s 54A].
Appealing a SACAT decision
An internal review of a SACAT decision may be sought by the original applicant, a person to whom the proceedings relate, the Office of the Public Advocate, any person who presented evidence or material before, or made submissions to, the Tribunal in the relevant proceedings, or any other person who satisfies the Tribunal that they have a proper interest in the matter [s 53].
With the leave (permission) of the Supreme Court, a further appeal may be made to the Supreme Court [s 53(e)].
Former Guardianship Board matters
Any matters commenced before the Guardianship Board before 30 March 2015 were transferred to SACAT.
If prior to 30 March 2015 a right to make an application or referral or to seek a review to the Guardianship Board existed, then from 30 March 2015, the matter will be heard before SACAT.
If prior to 30 March 2015 a right of appeal from the Guardianship Board to the District Court existed, then the appeal may be made to the District Court.
The Supreme Court may conduct an urgent review of the decision of a substitute decision-maker appointed under an advance care directive, on the application of:
The review is limited to ensuring that the substitute decision-maker's decision is in accordance with the advance care directive and the Advance Care Directives Act 2013 (SA) [s 52(2)(a)]. The review cannot be undertaken in respect of a decision to withdraw or withhold health care if the person who gave the advance care directive is in the advanced stages of an illness without any real prospect of recovery and the effect of the health care would be merely to prolong the person's life [s 52(2)(b)].
On a review, the Supreme Court may confirm, cancel or reverse the decision of the substitute decision-maker, and make any other orders necessary in the circumstances [s 52(3)].