The Succession Act 2023 (SA) will make significant changes to the law regarding wills and estates in South Australia. It is due to commence on 1 January 2025. The information in this chapter will be updated following commencement.
A general principle of law is the freedom of testation, that is, you can give your estate to whomever you wish. This can be considered unfair and unjust, for example, when a spouse or child of the deceased suffers hardship as a result of the deceased's whims, such as giving money to a particular organisation or ignoring the needs of a dependant.
To amend this situation, the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1972 (SA) was passed. Briefly, the object of this Act is to allow the court to award to an eligible applicant part of the deceased's estate, even though the deceased had left nothing, or very little, to that person in the will. The following relatives can apply for a re-allocation of the deceased's estate [s 6]:
A 'domestic partner' is someone who was in a registered relationship with the deceased under the Relationships Register Act 2016 (SA) at the date of death or some earlier date or someone declared to have been a domestic partner of the deceased under the Family Relationships Act 1975 (SA) at the date of death or some earlier date. For more information, see What is a domestic partnership?
An application must be made within 6 months after the grant of probate or letters of administration, although the court may give an extension of time if the estate has not been completely administered [see Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1972 (SA) s 8].
Not all people entitled to apply under the Act will obtain a re-allocation order. The test applied by the court is whether the deceased failed to provide adequately for the applicant's proper maintenance, education or advancement in life.
A challenge will not succeed on the ground that the will was unfair or unjust in its distribution, when in fact the will does provide adequately for the applicant's maintenance. For example, where a man leaves his large business to a football club and his house and a significant sum of money to his wife, the wife could not easily complain that she had not received adequate provision, even though it is perhaps unjust that a football club should receive more than her.
Over the years, courts have created certain guidelines as to what is adequate provision for proper maintenance. The main standard is that the court must put itself in the position of the deceased and consider the case as a wise and just, rather than a fond and foolish, family member. Some of the important considerations are:
A claim under the Inheritance (Family Provision) Act 1972 (SA) may also proceed where the deceased did not make a will and their estate is distributed according to the statutory order, see If there is no will.