skip to content

Refine results


Search by

Search by Algolia
Law Handbook banner image

When won't the Screening Unit assess all the information?

The Screening Unit is not required to assess all assessable information relating to a person [Child Safety (Prohibited Persons) Act 2016 (SA) s 26(2)]. This may occur for any reason, but will most definitely occur where the person has been found guilty of a presumptive disqualification offence [s 26A].

Presumptive disqualification offences are declared under the Child Safety (Prohibited Persons) Regulations 2019 (SA). Under regulation 15A, they include a range of violent offences where the victim is an adult, such as murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, and sexual assault, and a number of other offences including where the victim is a child. They include a conspiracy or attempt to commit such offences, and aiding or abetting such offences. For a complete list of presumptive disqualification offences, see Appendix 2 of the Working with Children Check Guidelines (July 2024) (PDF, 461KB).

Importantly, a person who has been found guilty of a presumptive disqualification offence includes a person who has been charged with a prescribed offence (see Who is prohibited from working with children? for more information about prescribed offences) or a presumptive disqualification offence, where the charge has not yet been finally determined [s 26A(3)(b)].

A person who has been found guilty of a presumptive disqualification offence (within the meaning of s 26A(3)) is presumed to pose an unacceptable risk to children [s 26A(1)(a)]. The Screening Unit need not consider or assess any further information in relation to the application [s 26A(1)(b)].

The Screening Unit must determine that such a person is prohibited from working with children unless the person can satisfy the Unit under s 26A(1)(c) that

  • the circumstances of the offence are such that it should be disregarded, or
  • exceptional circumstances exist such that the person does not appear to, or no longer appears to, pose an unacceptable risk to children.

A person who the Screening Unit identifies as having been found guilty of a presumptive disqualification offence will be invited to make a submission to the Unit that addresses one or both of these matters.

A person seeking to argue that the circumstances of the presumptive disqualification offence are such that it should be disregarded [s 26A(1)(c)(i)] should consider addressing the following in their submission:

  • how long ago the offence occurred
  • any penalty imposed
  • the facts and context of the offending
  • the impact on any victims of the offending
  • other factors that might mitigate (reduce) the seriousness of the offending.

A person seeking to argue that exceptional circumstances exist such that they do not appear to, or no longer appear to, pose an unacceptable risk to children [s 26A(1)(c)(ii)] should consider addressing the following in their submission:

  • any periods of voluntary good behaviour (where they have not offended or otherwise misbehaved even in the absence of a good behaviour bond or other court order)
  • evidence of employment history and any volunteering
  • evidence of education or other training
  • evidence of engagement in therapy, counselling, treatment programs or other personal growth.

The Working with Children Check Guidelines (July 2024) (PDF, 461KB) provide further guidance to applicants who have been found guilty of a presumptive disqualification offence (see pages 10 to 14).

When won't the Screening Unit assess all the information?  :  Last Revised: Fri Aug 2nd 2024
The content of the Law Handbook is made available as a public service for information purposes only and should not be relied upon as a substitute for legal advice. See Disclaimer for details. For free and confidential legal advice in South Australia call 1300 366 424.